Comments on: Those Shampoo Beauties http://www.piercingpens.net/those-shampoo-beauties Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:14:36 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Anonymous http://www.piercingpens.net/those-shampoo-beauties#comment-8008 Anonymous Sat, 02 Jul 2005 20:41:05 +0000 http://www.piercingpens.tk/archives/2004/09/23/those-shampoo-beauties/#comment-8008 U've got good pics, the site could use a tiny bit of work (no offense) its still awesome U’ve got good pics, the site could use a tiny bit of work (no offense) its still awesome

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.piercingpens.net/those-shampoo-beauties#comment-6125 Anonymous Fri, 24 Jun 2005 22:45:14 +0000 http://www.piercingpens.tk/archives/2004/09/23/those-shampoo-beauties/#comment-6125 Thank you, I just wanted to give a greeting and tell you I enjoyed reading your material. Thank you, I just wanted to give a greeting and tell you I enjoyed reading your material.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.piercingpens.net/those-shampoo-beauties#comment-5589 Anonymous Wed, 22 Jun 2005 07:03:25 +0000 http://www.piercingpens.tk/archives/2004/09/23/those-shampoo-beauties/#comment-5589 check this out! check this out!

]]> By: vanya http://www.piercingpens.net/those-shampoo-beauties#comment-50 vanya Sat, 25 Sep 2004 12:10:39 +0000 http://www.piercingpens.tk/archives/2004/09/23/those-shampoo-beauties/#comment-50 those shampoo beauties kept on telling on tv that they were doing it for the sake of art. but really i don't see anything "artsy" about it :/ those shampoo beauties kept on telling on tv that they were doing it for the sake of art. but really i don’t see anything “artsy” about it :/

]]> By: julian http://www.piercingpens.net/those-shampoo-beauties#comment-48 julian Sat, 25 Sep 2004 00:32:20 +0000 http://www.piercingpens.tk/archives/2004/09/23/those-shampoo-beauties/#comment-48 Sassy: Responsibility, as in sensitivity to the existing moral and legal standards in the territory where they chose to do that pictorial. When one is in public, it is polite to abide by the generally expected and accepted stardard, except when the act contrary to the prevailing stardards is justified. Double standard ba pag ganun? Funky_Momma: Yes, the photos published in the papers show the girls in that bra and a transparent raincoat. mayamaya: You're right in saying that the motivation for their act was mainly publicity. And if I may add, the more popular they get, the greater chance their product would sell. And now, they're invoking freedom of expression even as it is getting clearer that they're after profit all along. Sassy: Responsibility, as in sensitivity to the existing moral and legal standards in the territory where they chose to do that pictorial. When one is in public, it is polite to abide by the generally expected and accepted stardard, except when the act contrary to the prevailing stardards is justified. Double standard ba pag ganun?

Funky_Momma: Yes, the photos published in the papers show the girls in that bra and a transparent raincoat.

mayamaya: You’re right in saying that the motivation for their act was mainly publicity. And if I may add, the more popular they get, the greater chance their product would sell. And now, they’re invoking freedom of expression even as it is getting clearer that they’re after profit all along.

]]> By: mayamaya http://www.piercingpens.net/those-shampoo-beauties#comment-47 mayamaya Fri, 24 Sep 2004 03:09:52 +0000 http://www.piercingpens.tk/archives/2004/09/23/those-shampoo-beauties/#comment-47 i don't even think the handlers of these women were thinking 'decency' and the basis of their stint is not all guided by acting responsibly. the point was publicity and you know how it is --bad publicity is still good publicity. it depends on whose point of view we are talking about. if in terms of their ( the starlets )objective to get famous to guarantee future income, they might actually think that they acted with responsibility dahil pinangatawanan nila ang ginawa nila. as for myself, i have the freedom to turn off the tv set or skip the news concerning them when i read the papers. now that is acting responsibly for me. i don’t even think the handlers of these women were thinking ‘decency’ and the basis of their stint is not all guided by acting responsibly. the point was publicity and you know how it is –bad publicity is still good publicity. it depends on whose point of view we are talking about. if in terms of their ( the starlets )objective to get famous to guarantee future income, they might actually think that they acted with responsibility dahil pinangatawanan nila ang ginawa nila. as for myself, i have the freedom to turn off the tv set or skip the news concerning them when i read the papers. now that is acting responsibly for me.

]]> By: Funky_Momma http://www.piercingpens.net/those-shampoo-beauties#comment-46 Funky_Momma Fri, 24 Sep 2004 01:15:56 +0000 http://www.piercingpens.tk/archives/2004/09/23/those-shampoo-beauties/#comment-46 they say they didn't strip naked at all...they claim to be wearing a skintone bra...haha they say they didn’t strip naked at all…they claim to be wearing a skintone bra…haha

]]> By: Sassy http://www.piercingpens.net/those-shampoo-beauties#comment-45 Sassy Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:42:33 +0000 http://www.piercingpens.tk/archives/2004/09/23/those-shampoo-beauties/#comment-45 Define "responsibility". Is the definition based, in turn, on a perception of "decency" and "indecency"? Whose standards do we apply? Define “responsibility”. Is the definition based, in turn, on a perception of “decency” and “indecency”? Whose standards do we apply?

]]>